This alternative works even if Code Runner is not installed. If it is felt necessary to run code in terminal, doing so via a set task (Ref T-04 above), provides neatest output, almost matching output pane mode of Code Runner. In this case, the output of terminal pane is observed to be neatest as compared to other terminal based alternatives. Term Pane Name: Task-RunPython, Output Pane: Blank Same results whether Code Runner installed or Not Output Pane Name: Code, Termial Pane: Cmdĭefault task named RunPython set via tasks.json Term Pane Name: Code, Output Pane: BlankĬode Runner Installed and its runInTerminal property is set to false: Usual terminal clutter is present before commencement of output.Ĭode Runner Installed and its runInTerminal property is set to true: Term Pane Name: Python, Output Pane: blank Same results with Code Runner installed or Not. Results of some tests conducted at my end are placed below, for ready reference: Perhaps the hitch might lie in the design of VS-Code itself, wherein the output pane has intentionally been kept immune from user interaction. or click Run Code button in context menu of file explorer. or click Run Code button in editor title menu. the work-around suggested therein so far is the same as advised by you, i.e. or press F1 and then select/type Run Code, or right click the Text Editor and then click Run Code in editor context menu. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows. On exploring the internet, there are quite a few postings raising this problem. However, as explained in my post, I was trying to explore the feasibility of running user interaction code on output pane as its quality appears to be better than that on terminal pane. I had experimented with setting the runInTerminal property of code-runner to true,and there was no problem. (Sep-10-2019, 01:03 PM)snippsat Wrote: Search setting nInTerminal
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |